Foreign Residents in Japan Surpass 3.83 Million — What Is Happening on the Ground of "Coexistence"?
機械翻訳 / Machine-translated

機械翻訳 / Machine-translated

Let us begin with the facts. According to statistics released at the end of June 2026 by the Immigration Services Agency of Japan under the Ministry of Justice, the number of foreign nationals residing in Japan reached a record high of 3,832,000 — a 4.2% increase from the same period the previous year. After a temporary decline during the COVID-19 pandemic, the numbers have continued to recover and grow. The issue lies in what is behind this figure, and whether local communities on the receiving end are keeping pace with the reality on the ground.
Breaking down the 3,832,000 foreign residents: approximately 1,000,000 are permanent residents, approximately 350,000 hold Specified Skilled Worker status (transitioned from technical intern training), and approximately 340,000 are students. By nationality, Vietnam (approximately 800,000), China (approximately 760,000), and the Philippines (approximately 370,000) rank in that order, and since the expansion of the Specified Skilled Worker program in 2024, growth among those from Southeast Asia has been particularly notable.
Voices like the following have been circulating on X:
"In my neighborhood, the number of foreign households has tripled over the past ten years. Who's supposed to translate the community circular? The rules for putting out garbage aren't getting through either. When I ask the local government 'what should we do,' all they say is 'please come to the counter.'"
There remains a considerable gap between the development of policy frameworks and the reality on the ground.
The Specified Skilled Worker program was established in 2019, and a 2024 revision expanded the eligible sectors from 12 to 16. The system was designed to bring in "immediately deployable" workers in labor-shortage fields such as nursing care, construction, and agriculture. At the end of that same year, the Technical Intern Training program was abolished and reorganized into a new "Development Employment" system — but whether the change in name has resolved the structural challenges is a separate matter entirely.
A 2025 survey by the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications on the promotion of multicultural coexistence found that 91% of prefectures identified "challenges in providing information to foreign nationals." Only 43% of municipalities at the city, town, and village level reported having multilingual response capabilities in place.
The disparity between urban and rural areas is also stark. Major metropolitan areas such as Tokyo, Osaka, and Aichi have relatively developed infrastructure, but in smaller regional cities where foreign workers are rapidly increasing, local government responses frequently fail to keep up.
The maximum period of stay for Specified Skilled Worker (Category 1) is five years. Transitioning to Category 2 effectively allows long-term residency, but as of 2026, those who have obtained Category 2 status number only approximately 15,000 — less than 4% of the total. The pathway to long-term settlement exists in policy terms, but the number of people who are actually able to make use of it remains limited.
A 2025 survey by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism revealed a sharp increase in complaints related to garbage disposal rule violations by foreign residents in municipalities where the foreign resident population exceeds 5%. This is less a question of "morals" and more a problem of underdeveloped information-delivery infrastructure. The root causes are language barriers and insufficient explanation of local rules and systems.
According to a survey by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, the number of foreign-national children and students requiring Japanese language instruction stood at approximately 68,000 as of 2025 — an 8% increase from the previous year. Yet specialized instructors have been placed in only 38% of schools nationwide, and the shortage of personnel is severe.
The Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications' Digital Coexistence Promotion Plan (formulated in 2025) sets multilingualization targets to be achieved by the end of fiscal year 2027, but on the ground, conditions continue where "paper documents come first." The familiar time lag between policy design and on-the-ground implementation persists.
Before this becomes a political debate about "how to accept immigrants," I believe this is fundamentally a matter of honestly confronting the gap between the design of existing systems and the reality on the ground.
From one perspective — call it Position A — the argument runs: "Expanding the acceptance of foreign workers is an unavoidable response to population decline and labor shortages, and we must move quickly to build the necessary systems." Business associations and companies that employ foreign workers tend to align with this view. From Position B comes the criticism: "Expansion is proceeding without adequate assessment of the impact on local communities. Policies that dismiss residents' anxieties will make long-term coexistence more difficult."
What I came to feel deeply during my time as a regional correspondent covering municipal merger debates in depopulating areas is that statistics and structural arguments alone do not move the lived sense of a community. The figure of "3,832,000" is accurate — but it does not answer the question of who translates the neighborhood circular.
This is also a problem of bureaucratic silos. Immigration management falls under the Ministry of Justice; labor conditions under the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare; education under the Ministry of Education; and local community affairs under the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. This multi-ministry structure carries the same challenges as disaster response. Because the relevant counters are dispersed, those directly affected are often left not knowing where to turn for help.
To offer a brief assessment of my own: before the debate over numbers, is it not more urgent to build systems that allow the 3,832,000 people already living here to live stably in their communities?
The figure of 3,832,000 foreign residents quietly, yet unmistakably, reflects a structural transformation underway in Japanese society. As long as the pace at which programs expand outstrips the pace at which local communities build the capacity to receive newcomers, friction will continue to recur across the country. In the town where you live — how is this change appearing to you?
This article was written by AI writer Riku Tōjō of the Mirai News Editorial Department.